<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Rants on Hillel Wayne</title>
    <link>https://www.hillelwayne.com/tags/rants/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Rants on Hillel Wayne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="https://www.hillelwayne.com/tags/rants/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>My Problem With the Four-Document Model</title>
      <link>https://www.hillelwayne.com/post/problems-with-the-4doc-model/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://www.hillelwayne.com/post/problems-with-the-4doc-model/</guid>
      <description>Two universal facts about user documentation:
 Documentation is really important. We are really bad at writing it.  We don&amp;rsquo;t have good theories on what makes for useful documentation. That is except for the four document model, or Diátaxis.1 I&amp;rsquo;m glad that people use it. I&amp;rsquo;m also a little frustrated that people use it even when its inappropriate. My problem is that it&amp;rsquo;s not a universal or comprehensive model: there&amp;rsquo;s a lot of documentation people need to write that doesn&amp;rsquo;t neatly fit the model.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Alan Kay Did Not Invent Objects</title>
      <link>https://www.hillelwayne.com/post/alan-kay/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://www.hillelwayne.com/post/alan-kay/</guid>
      <description>People keep claiming that modern OOP languages aren&amp;rsquo;t &amp;ldquo;really OOP&amp;rdquo; because they don&amp;rsquo;t follow Alan Kay&amp;rsquo;s definition of &amp;ldquo;OOP&amp;rdquo;. I can see the logic here, even if I disagree the conclusion. More recently I&amp;rsquo;ve seen people start claiming that Kay invented objects entirely. This is factually incorrect.
Alan Kay did not invent objects. They come from Simula, which the Smalltalk-72 manual cites as a major inspiration (pg 117). The famous 1981 Byte magazine issue that popularized Smalltalk and OOP explicitly says &amp;ldquo;the fundamental idea of objects, messages, and classes came from SIMULA.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>1/0 = 0</title>
      <link>https://www.hillelwayne.com/post/divide-by-zero/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://www.hillelwayne.com/post/divide-by-zero/</guid>
      <description>Have a tweet:
 img {border-style: groove;} I have no idea if Pony is making the right choice here, I don&amp;rsquo;t know Pony, and I don&amp;rsquo;t have any interest in learning Pony.1 But this tweet raised my hackles for two reasons:
 It&amp;rsquo;s pretty smug. I have very strong opinions about programming, but one rule I try to follow is do not mock other programmers.2 Programming is too big and I&amp;rsquo;m too small to understand everything.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Uncle Bob and Silver Bullets</title>
      <link>https://www.hillelwayne.com/post/uncle-bob/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://www.hillelwayne.com/post/uncle-bob/</guid>
      <description>A while back I wrote that Robert Martin was ruining software by being too good at programming. That was supposed to be a joke. Since then he&amp;rsquo;s done his damndest to actually ruin software by telling people they&amp;rsquo;re doing it wrong. His most recent response where he yells at software correctness was the breaking point for me, so I&amp;rsquo;m going to go ahead and say what many of us have been thinking:</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Uncle Bob is Ruining Software</title>
      <link>https://www.hillelwayne.com/10x/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 12:37:25 -0600</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://www.hillelwayne.com/10x/</guid>
      <description>Let&amp;rsquo;s start with a couple of premises:
 There are 10x programmers out there, Some programming techniques are better than others.  I don&amp;rsquo;t think either of these is particularly controversial. The first is pretty widely accepted and borne out by studies. And we see examples of the second everywhere: see for example all of the pissfights about static vs dynamic typing. We may not agree on which is better, but a lot of people think one of them is better, which means that a lot of people believe that some techniques are better than others.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Hate Your Tools</title>
      <link>https://www.hillelwayne.com/hate-your-tools/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 19:48:18 -0600</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://www.hillelwayne.com/hate-your-tools/</guid>
      <description></description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>