<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Programming on Hillel Wayne</title>
    <link>https://www.hillelwayne.com/tags/programming/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Programming on Hillel Wayne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 12:37:25 -0600</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="https://www.hillelwayne.com/tags/programming/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Uncle Bob is Ruining Software</title>
      <link>https://www.hillelwayne.com/10x/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 12:37:25 -0600</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://www.hillelwayne.com/10x/</guid>
      <description>Let&amp;rsquo;s start with a couple of premises:
 There are 10x programmers out there, Some programming techniques are better than others.  I don&amp;rsquo;t think either of these is particularly controversial. The first is pretty widely accepted and borne out by studies. And we see examples of the second everywhere: see for example all of the pissfights about static vs dynamic typing. We may not agree on which is better, but a lot of people think one of them is better, which means that a lot of people believe that some techniques are better than others.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Hate Your Tools</title>
      <link>https://www.hillelwayne.com/hate-your-tools/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 19:48:18 -0600</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://www.hillelwayne.com/hate-your-tools/</guid>
      <description></description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>