<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Oop on Hillel Wayne</title>
    <link>https://www.hillelwayne.com/tags/oop/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Oop on Hillel Wayne</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="https://www.hillelwayne.com/tags/oop/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Alan Kay Did Not Invent Objects</title>
      <link>https://www.hillelwayne.com/post/alan-kay/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://www.hillelwayne.com/post/alan-kay/</guid>
      <description>People keep claiming that modern OOP languages aren&amp;rsquo;t &amp;ldquo;really OOP&amp;rdquo; because they don&amp;rsquo;t follow Alan Kay&amp;rsquo;s definition of &amp;ldquo;OOP&amp;rdquo;. I can see the logic here, even if I disagree the conclusion. More recently I&amp;rsquo;ve seen people start claiming that Kay invented objects entirely. This is factually incorrect.
Alan Kay did not invent objects. They come from Simula, which the Smalltalk-72 manual cites as a major inspiration (pg 117). The famous 1981 Byte magazine issue that popularized Smalltalk and OOP explicitly says &amp;ldquo;the fundamental idea of objects, messages, and classes came from SIMULA.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>